The Next Round: Choosing Need Without Losing Demand

The next Opportunity Zone round changes the governor’s decision, but it does not change the underlying market problem. This chapter connects the 2025 statutory changes and the 2026 nomination guidance to the Ohio evidence, then compares three ways to choose among eligible tracts: favor places that already look investable, favor the places with the deepest disinvestment, or seek places that are market-ready and still need support. The practical judgment is conditional: new designations can shape the eligible field, but they cannot guarantee that capital will follow.

The timing makes the choice unusually consequential. The first round of designations was made with limited state experience about where private investment would actually go. The Ohio record now offers a warning against assuming that a designation map is an investment plan. At the same time, the new rules narrow and structure the set of places governors can nominate. Selection is therefore not a choice between an unlimited number of worthy communities; it is an allocation decision under legal constraints and uncertain investor response.

What the new rules actually change

The 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act made the Opportunity Zone tax incentive permanent. The first new round after the law takes effect is scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2027, with additional designation rounds every 10 years. The permanence matters because it changes the program from a one-time designation exercise into a recurring policy cycle. It does not, however, turn each designated tract into a guaranteed recipient of capital. The Ohio evidence remains relevant precisely because a longer or repeated eligibility framework still depends on private selection.

The nomination window is also defined. The IRS and Treasury say that state chief executives, along with the District of Columbia and US territories, begin nominating eligible population census tracts on July 1, 2026. The nomination period lasts 90 days and may receive one 30-day extension. After nominations, the Treasury Secretary certifies and designates the tracts, with additional guidance expected before the January 1, 2027, effective date. These dates define the administrative sequence; they do not identify which tracts will ultimately be chosen or predict how much money they will receive.

Eligibility is narrower than a general invitation to nominate any struggling place. For the 2027 round, a tract must qualify as a low-income community. Revenue Procedure 2026-14 identifies 25,332 eligible population census tracts, including 8,334 tracts composed entirely of a rural area. A state may designate no more than 25 percent of its low-income communities. The official release also describes special count rules: a state with 25 to 99 low-income communities may designate 25 eligible population tracts, while a state with fewer than 25 may designate all eligible population tracts within the state.

The rural count and rural-specific benefits give the new round an explicit geographic concern. But “eligible rural tract” and “funded rural tract” remain separate categories. The official guidance establishes the size of the eligible pool and the process for nomination. It does not establish that a rural benefit will overcome the market conditions that contributed to Ohio’s rural and micropolitan areas receiving only 1 percent of total Opportunity Zone investment.