Overview
This series examines zombie firms in ten Asian emerging market economies, defined in the central study by an interest coverage ratio below one for at least three consecutive years. It traces how bank forbearance and creditor coordination can prolong low-productivity capacity, crowd out healthier firms, and lower domestic inflation and growth. It then follows the effect through global value chains, especially intermediate goods, while testing slowdown, productivity, demand, China, and foreign-bank alternatives. The evidence supports a conditional supply-side interpretation and points to insolvency systems that enable viable restructuring or orderly exit, not a universal causal law.
Learning outcomes
- The study’s zombie label captures sustained financial distress, not a legal finding that a firm is nonviable.
- Bank forbearance and creditor coordination are consistent with prolonged weakness and credit reallocation away from healthier borrowers.
- Zombie-heavy sectors are associated with weaker non-zombie performance and, at country level, lower inflation and real GDP growth.
- Trade exposure, especially through intermediate goods, is associated with lower importer prices and output even when foreign banks remain insulated.
- Effective insolvency systems must make viable restructuring credible and nonviable exit orderly; formal rights alone are insufficient.
Keywords
Preview every chapter · Unlock full text, audio, and video from chapter 4
PlansFAQ
What is a zombie firm in this study?
In this study, a zombie firm has an interest coverage ratio below 1 for at least three consecutive years; that is a financial classification, not a legal insolvency ruling.
How can zombie firms lower prices without being more productive?
They can keep excess capacity operating through favorable borrowing and delayed exit, then sell at lower markups; that disinflation can coexist with weaker investment and growth.
How does zombie-firm distress reach advanced economies?
It reaches advanced economies mainly through trade-linked goods markets, especially intermediate inputs; in the 29-economy panel, greater exposure is associated with lower CPI inflation and real GDP growth.
What evidence distinguishes zombie excess supply from a productivity shock?
Zombie exposure is associated with lower importer GDP as well as lower prices, while productivity exposure lowers CPI without a significant GDP decline; import-value effects are diagnostic, not definitive.
What should insolvency systems do about zombie firms?
They should separate viable firms for coordinated restructuring or going-concern sale from nonviable firms needing orderly exit; courts and practitioners determine whether those routes work.