Overview
This series examines whether higher CACFP reimbursement for qualifying meals changed what active Illinois home daycare providers offered. It traces the mechanism from dinner’s food cost to later hours and school-age summer-care variety, then explains how the 2010 Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act and required redetermination created a low-to-high comparison. The evidence supports more reported dinner and evening-shift offers, later closing times, and greater summer-shift variety, with no detectable improvement in selected quality proxies and no evidence of price declines. Because the study observes provider-reported offers among active participating homes, it does not establish actual meal use, filled places, household costs, parent employment, child development, entry or exit, or total capacity; responses are weaker in rural settings.
Learning outcomes
- Higher CACFP reimbursement is associated with more reported dinner and evening-shift offers among selected active Illinois home daycare providers.
- The timing response is selective: closing moves later and shift variety rises, while opening time, daytime meals, and overnight shifts do not change detectably.
- School-age summer-shift variety increases in the repeated body and table results, but the paper reports conflicting summer figures.
- The study finds no evidence of price declines and no detectable change in accreditation or vacancy proxies.
- Reported offers are not actual use: the study does not establish meals served, filled places, household costs, parent employment, child outcomes, entry, exit, or total capacity.
Keywords
Preview every chapter · Unlock full text, audio, and video from chapter 4
PlansFAQ
How can a CACFP meal reimbursement affect childcare hours?
It can make later care more viable by offsetting part of the qualifying dinner cost, especially when providers already have the basic operation but face food costs at the evening margin. The Illinois evidence concerns offered schedules, not guaranteed use.
What did the Illinois CACFP study find about dinner and evening care?
It found that moving from low to high reimbursement was associated with a 5.0-percentage-point increase in reported dinner offers and a 5.5-point increase in reported evening-shift offers among selected active home providers. These are provider-level offers, not counts of meals served or filled places.
Was the Illinois reimbursement change a randomized experiment?
No. The study uses a policy-created comparison between providers who started all-low in 2009 and moved to school mode and high reimbursement in 2011 and those who remained all-low, with fixed effects and pre-reform checks. The design supports a more credible causal interpretation, not random assignment.
Did higher CACFP reimbursement make childcare cheaper or better?
The study does not show that it made care cheaper or improved measured quality: it finds no evidence of price declines and no detectable change in accreditation or vacancy proxies. It does not measure every quality dimension or total household spending.